The way Nehru destroyed India with quotas and secularism shows he was diabolic and a destructive character.
The way he threatened and asked Sardar to lay off from Kashmir affairs showed the same destructive power and a vengeful attitude.
But like a dog wagging its tail at its master, Nehru was just doing the same to his communist spiritual guru Stalin who made Nehru sit on his lap to lap up his pseudo communism which is euphemistically called by our shameless secularists as “””””Socialism”””””.
This perverted Nehru who was already a perverted man — or would he have accused and degraded “sarva dharma sama bhava” Hindus with secularism?
Nehru was also rosily thinking that China should be highly appreciative of his perversion (or secretly at least) of supping with Russian Communists and Indian Left the skills of which he amply demonstrated after sitting on monstrous Uncle Stalin’s lap.
Stalin’s Socialism was worse the Chinese communism as Stalin had mastered the art of frequently disposing of his enemies wholesale unlike one LONG MARCH OF CHAIRMAN MAO.
Stalin’s finer version of Chinese communism made Nehru believe would please Chinese who would come kissing him of being such a nice and wonderful boy next door. But Chinese were in no mood to be monkeyed with even if Stalin called them brothers and patted Nehru often as a dog gets patted for obeying his master’s command. Chinese meant business and they were waiting to kick Nehru once Tibet was settled in their favour and they did if firmly and insultingly for no reason than pure hatred for a man who himself was diabolic to his own principles.
But NEHRU WAS actually FAR WORSE THAN ONE CAN THINK OF. HE BROUGHT IN HIS SECULAR TROJAN HORSE wheeling it into India and on the wheels of Trojan Horse came ISLAM’S DIABOLIC GAME PLAN OF UNSETTLING A HINDU INDIA FOR FUTURE USE FOR TURBULENCE.
Obviously such a devilish act could NEVER be performed by a Hindu who believed in Sanatan Dharma. Yes, it can only be done without iota of doubt by a hardcore Islamist who was in sheep’s clothing.
ONLY HISTORIANS untouched and uncontaminated by secular perversion CAN SAY exactly WHO NEHRU EXACTLY WAS for the horrible damage he inflicted on unsuspecting MOTHER INDIA with the twin cancers of Quotas and Secularism when he saw to it that the WHOLE INVIDIOUS CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE WRITTEN BY ONE MAN, YES ONE MAN, ONLY AND THAT WAS NONE OTHER THAN AMBEDKAR who had a long standing grudge against upper caste Hindus. This blow delivered by Nehru through Ambedkar was a mortal blow which even Mahmud of Ghazni would have envied. As things stand India will never recover from it.
MAY BE once Netaji files keep rolling INDIA COULD GET THE final glimpse or an ANSWER on Nehru, ON THE MAN WHO NEVER WAS,