Reading Ajit Datta’s post two things clearly stand out: 1) Yakub oversaw ISI money being deposited into Indian accounts, and its distribution among other accused involved in the blasts case.
2)The entire surrender story is fabricated because Justice P.D. Kode believed so or had said so to India Today’s Gaurav Sawant.
FOR ARGUMENT SAKE LET ME AGREE ON BOTH THE POINTS THAT YAKUB WAS THE CONDUIT OF ISI MONEY AND HE DID NOT actually SURRENDER as is made out AND HIS ROLE IN THE CONSPIRACY was that which LED TO slaughter of 350 INNOCENT lives. FINE.
Now tell me how does Yakub’s crime superior to the 10 bomb-planters? Had the bomb-planters not done their job feeling remorse at the eleventh hour no one would have died on that fateful day DESPITE THE CONSPIRACY OF YAKUB. RIGHT?
NOW SUPREME COURT IN ITS WISDOM REFUSES TO HANG THE 10 bomb-planters but strangely insists on hanging Yakub? WHAT DOES THIS SHOW? DOESN’T IT SHOW QUOTA INDIA’S POLITICAL CONSPIRACY to muddy the public opinion?
I CONDEMN IF the intent of Quota India is to vicariously hang YAKUB in lieu of punishing DAWOOD AND TIGER MEMON.
QUOTA INDIA should have fought a war, if need be, to FORCE PAKISTAN TO SURRENDER THE TWO MAIN CULPRITS. IT DID NOTHING. Yakub cannot be made a scapegoat for Quota India’s follies or cowardice.
NO CIVILIZED human being would ACCEPT THAT.