On India Today TV BJP spokeswoman Shaina NC was sickeningly justifying Yakub’s hanging saying he is guilty as Hell because the Supreme Court said so and also was implying as if he was the one who funded everything, not Dawood, for Mumbai blasts to consummate.
Most surprising was when she ended by saying that SC CANNOT GO WRONG AND EVERYONE MUST RESPECT THE SC VERDICT.
Wasn’t the same SC instrumental in Quotaising and vertically splitting India permanently into two blocks when boulder VP Singh brought the Mandal Terror to the hallowed precincts of the apex court with SC caving in like a pack of cards?
BUT TO SAY SC CANNOT GO WRONG is ludicrous.
WAS KEHAR SINGH guilty when he WAS HANGED BY THE SUPREME COURT?
WILL QUOTA INDIA TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT KEHAR THAT HE WAS MURDERED BY THE STATE? Or if there was some SECRET evidence against Kehar let Quota India reveal at least now.
THEN ANOTHER WONDER. Ujjwal Nigam was saying in the same programme that “what if Yakub had surrendered? Law is law. If the court says hang him he should be hanged.”
WHAT NONSENSE? Wonder if Ujjwal Nigam knows meaning of SURRENDER? WILL SOMEONE SURRENDER TO BE HANGED?
YAKUB’S CASE IS CLEAR VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AS AFTER KEEPING HIM FOR 22 YEARS IN DEATH ROW QUOTA INDIA SAYS NOW HE WILL BE HANGED.THIS IS DOUBLE JEOPARDY. In other words it is as if Yakub is being tried for the same crime twice and is undergoing two sets of imprisonments.
(If say a man has been arrested for murder and the court discharges him because no SUFFICIENT evidence was shown by the prosecution and if later after the acquittal new evidence crops up showng that man as the murderer yet he CANNOT be tried or sentenced for THAT murder. THIS IS CALLED DOUBLE JEOPARDY)
GAURAV SAWANT SUPPORTING SHAINA SAID: “There is no such thing as 14 years for life term. SC had clarified that life term means until the man dies in jail.” If this is true CIVILIZED WORLD MUST TAKE NOTE OF IT.
ACTUALLY LIFE TERM MEANS MAXIMUM 14 YEARS. SUBJECT TO GOOD BEHAVIOUR THE CONVICT CAN BE RELEASED MUCH, MUCH EARLIER.
QUOTA INDIA’S ANOTHER SHAME WAS RECOUNTED BY TDP MLA Revanth Reddy recently who was in jail for a month for bribing someone. Revanth was given a cook called Nagi Reddy who is undergoing life term. Do my Facebook friends know what his crime was for him to suffer life term?
Nagi Reddy was involved in a land dispute with his cousin. One day his wife and small son were with him in the field when his cousin came to quarrel. As the quarrel heated up Nagi hit his cousin with a stick. To his misfortune the man ducked and Nagi Reddy’s blow fell on his son’s head who died on the spot. THE COURT SENTENENCED HIM TO LIFE TERM which according to Gaurav Sawant Nagi Reddy will die in prison.
NO wonder TERRORISTs LOVE TO HATE QUOTA INDIA.
Capital punishment is medieval uncivilised behaviour. BELIEVE IT OR NOT most of the time when death sentence is awarded it depends on the judge’s “whims and fancies.”
I heard Kode, who sentenced Yakub to death, speaking on the TV. He said: “AWARDING YAKUB DEATH SENTENCE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YAKUB SURRENDERING.” So if Yakub had sat safely and comfortably in Pakistan whom would Kode then sentence? CIVILIZED MAN WILL NEVER KILL SOMEONE WHO HAS SURRENDERED. I HOPE QUOTA INDIA UNDERSTANDS THIS.
AND QUOTA INDIA HAS ANOTHER BLUFF UP ITS SLEEVE. IT PRETENDS DEATH SENTENCE WILL DETER CULPRITS FROM TERROR ACTS.
France and Britian don’t have death sentence and yet these two nations are MUCH more effective in fighting terrorism than say the U.S or Quota India.
Infinite terror attacks have occurred on Indian soil and infinite deaths have taken place (I use the word ‘infinite’ because one has lost count of it) and yet Quota India is hardly bothered to see the culprits are brought to book because the police is ineffective or incapable of hunting those who perpetrate terror and nail them with evidence.
PRAY, WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CULPRITS WHO STAGED DILSUKHNAGAR BLASTS IN HYDERABAD when 20 were killed and eight times that figure were injured, some of them permanently?